Vacation placement Review

by Mishcon de Reya

This review was submitted over 4 years ago, so some of the information it contains may no longer be relevant.

Rating

2.5/5
  • About You
    2.5
  • The Company
    3.2
  • Everything Else
    1.6

    About You

  • 1. To what extent did you enjoy the insight?
  • Mishcon is a fascinating firm, and their vacation scheme is an excellent insight into what the firm does. The people you get to work with clearly love their jobs, and you get given a trainee buddy to learn the ins and outs of their work. You sit in two different areas, although you do not have more choice over what these are beyond general area. It was unfortunate that the first day of the spring scheme fell on Easter Monday, as it did shorten the experience. I really appreciated that the work I was able to do felt largely authentic. My one complaint with this scheme is with the application process itself: the number of interviews you need to pass to get the scheme make this an exhausting process, on top of which they do not guarantee a training contract interview (and considering the small intake, there really is no way to tell how you've done). While this makes sense for the firm, this means that you can't plan on getting this job, which you might be able to do with other schemes.

    5/5

  • 2. To what extent did you feel valued during your time at the company or firm?
  • While everyone was very welcoming, there were little things which didn't feel very welcoming. You don't get a personalized email, as you do at some other firms, but rather a generic 'summer placement' email. Because of the size of the office, you also get fit in where there is space, and there is occasionally overlap between your occupation of the desk and the person who's meant to be sat there. Finally, the reminders at how many people we beat for the scheme, while clearly meant to be congratulatory, really reminded me that I was entirely replaceable. There are not a significant points, but did hamper feeling welcome at times.

    2/5

  • 3. How much guidance/support did you receive during the insight?
  • Beyond the talk on the first day, we did not receive too much guidance on how the scheme would occur. However, in terms of individual tasks, I was given great support by my supervisors, trainee buddy, and the paralegals. I felt able to ask questions about my work, and was able to get a clear idea of what I had to do.

    3/5

  • 4. To what extent did/will the skills you developed, and information you received, assist you in your degree studies and beyond?
  • The work I did was largely text based, spending lots of time in Microsoft Word, and I did some research which would be useful if I was still at university. The amount I learned is consistent with other vacation schemes: it is ultimately a niche skill set. However, I felt that the IT induction was entirely useless for my week of work. It was not a practical demonstration (only a lecture), and I felt like I had to learn as I went to along.

    1/5

    The Company

  • 5. How well structured was the insight?
  • We received talks at least once a day about the firm's practice areas, giving us the opportunity to ask question. There were two socials. Beyond this, the work was set by the supervisors and varied greatly between participants. This seems fairly consistent with how other schemes are organized, but given that some of the feedback I received was that I didn't ask for enough work, this aspect may be lacking.

    3/5

  • 6. How was the general atmosphere during your insight?
  • Very pleasant. The other members of the scheme were very nice, and the grad rec team were lovely. The firm seemed very receptive to our presence, and I never felt unwelcome during my time here. It was a little awkward that they kept on reminding us how many applicants we had successfully beat out for our spot on the scheme - while this didn't make anyone competitive, it could have quite easily.

    4/5

  • 7. In terms of personal training and development, to what extent did the company or firm invest in you?
  • Given the length of the application process, the firm clearly invests a lot in you by the time you reach the scheme. However, on the scheme itself, I felt that the training we received was lacking. The IT training was a bit of a joke, and had to be compensated for all week. There were also technical difficulties in accessing the cantine (to their credit, grad rec really worked to fix this)

    2/5

  • 8. To what extent did the insight help you to understand what it would be like to have a full time role with the company or firm?
  • I was fortunate, and had some wonderful trainee buddies - they were able to explain what the liked and disliked about the firm, what work they did, and what their lives were like at the firm. Similarly, senior members in the firm were able to explain their work clearly, as well as what they liked about working at Mishcon.

    5/5

  • 9. How much did the insight help you in understanding the company culture?
  • 5/5

  • 10. How valuable was the content in helping you to decide on your future career path?
  • 3/5

    Everything Else

  • 11. Were you paid or reimbursed adequately for this experience?
  • The vac scheme paid well - given that the first day was Easter Monday, the amount was slightly more than expected. For the interviews, the firm reimburses travel expenses for the first interview but not the second - an unusual policy. Finally, the amount reimbursed is lower than other comparable firms.


  • 12. Were there opportunities for networking and meeting other employees of the company or firm?
  • Other than the organized socials, there were no formal opportunities to network with people from your department. Given that this is something that the firm assesses, this is unfortunate. Any networking has to be done balancing the work given and the numerous presentations given to us - and I would argue that there is no time for it.

    1/5

  • 13. How were the networking/ social event opportunities?
  • There were two socials: a drinks reception in the office, and a social at Bounce. While the events themselves were good, with good food and wine, they ultimately felt a bit flat. The drinks reception did not feel like a social at all - more of a graduate recruitment networking than an after work social - while Bounce is a fairly average time.

    3/5

  • 14. Did you find out about activities that employees can get involved in outside of work?
  • Given the sheer volume of talks, it's impressive that none dedicated any proper time to this topic. While there was one talk about the life of a trainee, it was incredibly vague and not particularly informative. A talk discussing the social events, pro bono, benefits, and work life of the firm in general would have been very useful, particularly given the firm's reputation in these areas.

    1/5

  • 15. Would you recommend this insight to a friend?
  • 3/5

    Report this review

Details

Insight / Vacation Scheme (< 4 Weeks)

Legal/Law

London

April 2018


View More Reviews